Showing posts with label american lit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label american lit. Show all posts

Monday, January 20, 2014

Sister Carrie by Theodore Dreiser

 (This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, I will earn a small commission.)

Today, I'm reviewing Sister Carrie by Theodore Dreiser .

Summary (from Amazon.com)
An 18-year-old girl without money or connections ventures forth from her small town in search of a better life in Theodore Dreiser's revolutionary first novel. The chronicle of Carrie Meeber's rise from obscurity to fame — and the effects of her progress on the men who use her and are used in turn — aroused a storm of controversy and debate upon its debut in 1900. The author's nonjudgmental portrait of a heroine who violates the contemporary moral code outraged some critics and elated others. A century later, Dreiser's compelling plot and realistic characters continue to fascinate readers.

Review
I'm going to start out by saying that I really liked this book, though it doesn't really seem like the kind of thing I would expect myself to like.

The writing was fantastic, but took some getting used to. I'm used to reading books where the underlying messages are just that: underlying. Not so here. He regularly pauses the story to give commentary, which sometimes appears unrelated to the story, but in the end ties in somehow. He has strong opinions, and he's not afraid to tell them to you. A lot. That does mean that this book in incredibly quotable though, which makes for a different kind of reading experience. There is a lot of foreshadowing and references to later plot events in the writing, and it almost makes me want to just start at the beginning again to catch it all.

The characters in this book are what make it so great. Despite Carrie being the title character, I would argue that she doesn't feel much like the main character. Really, none of them do, but if I had to pick one person to be the official "main character," it would be Hurstwood, even though he isn't even in the first portion of the book.Carrie is young and naive, but Dreiser doesn't use her to make it look bad. In fact, she is the character with, in some ways, the best ending. That of course, it a topic that could be hotly debated (and has caused some family discussions at my house). Drouet is a very realistic character who floats along in his own little bubble. Though he is a good deal smarter than Carrie, he still underestimates her.

The plot was rather unlike most modern books I'm used to reading. While it had the major elements of a story, the pacing felt a little strange. At some times near the end, I felt like I was reading a whole different book than I had been at the beginning. Carrie's life takes  very major turn about half way through the book and at that point the whole focus changes. While the plot was good, the characters and writing take the stage here.

There was one point in the story when Hurstwood is about to make a major decision that will completely alter the course of his life. As he wavers between two options, his thoughts and emotions become more and more conflicted. What Dreiser managed to do in that scene was make Hurstwood a real person. In that scene, Hurstwood goes through a process of thoughts and emotions that was intensely relate-able. Everyone, at some point in their life, has had a moment when they debated doing something that they were not sure was right or moral.

I really love this book, if you can't tell, and I didn't even really notice that it was depressing (though other people have said it was). To me, it is a story of life, of the natural rise and fall of people, and while that certainly can be depressing, it can also be fascinating.

Who Should Read This Book
 I recommend this book to people who enjoy classic literature (this doesn't read like a modern novel). I also think that people who like Edith Wharton (a favorite author of mine) who like this too. It shows a very different perspective on the same time and place.

Thursday, May 2, 2013

The Grapes of Wrath - John Steinbeck

 
Just a warning - This post will contain a few spoilers. I will try to be careful about giving too much away, but if you have not read the book and really don't want to know anything about what happens, you might want to skip this post. The ending is not given away, and neither are any major plot points.

Today's post is about The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck, which was the book that our high school American Lit discussion group read last month. This post might be a little different then most of the ones I have read lately, mostly because I think that which such a great book like this one, analyzing the individual parts of the book does not make a lot of sense.

So, here is a brief review of the three things I usually talk about: characters, plot, and writing. The characters are amazing. They are believable, human, and relate-able. The plot was what it was. I think you simply can't judge the plot of a Steinbeck book. For the writing, let's just say that I think Steinbeck is one of the best writers ever. His East of Eden may be my all time favorite book. Enough said on those topics.

The Grapes of Wrath is unique in that it was written in 1939, in the middle of the Great Depression. During our discussion, somebody suggested that perhaps the ending, which is pretty open ended, is a reflection of that. He could not say what had happened to the Joads, because it hadn't happened yet.

One of the things about this kind of historical fiction is that I, the reader, really can't argue with the author. With a lot of books, if I didn't like something that happened, it is because it is not believable, or it doesn't make sense in the flow of events. With this book, there were parts of the story I did not like, or where I wished something had happened differently. But this time, it's not Steinbeck's fault. Maybe what I sometimes disliked was how real it felt. I couldn't argue with what happened to Tom or Casey because it felt like what would have really happened.

This book is full of symbols (though not as many as The Great Gatsby) in its in between "commentary" chapters. The one that stuck out most to me was the turtle near the beginning of the book. That turtle was going to get to where it wanted to go, and it didn't care how long it took. Getting turned over on an embankment was a dissapointment, and it slowed him down by several hours, but all it was was a delay. Even getting picked up by Tom was not the end of the road for him. Eventually, he got away, and kept plodding along. To me, that was the Joad family in a nutshell. Whatever happened, whoever died, they were going to keep plodding along.

That's my review of the Grapes of Wrath, by John Steinbeck.